Soon ago, National Public Radio reported that 29% of the US population was regarded as on the left politically. That is interesting as about 28% of the population is abstract /random, an explanation that relates to personal style. The research of personal styles usually includes thinking styles and learning styles. The studies are made to improve education, self-awareness, relationships, mental health, and productivity. There is apparently little research available on whether personal styles are linked to political views, but the likelihood is interesting. Personal styles reveal something about how exactly we learn, think, and relate with the world. Knowing a little about personal styles is a useful thing.

Learning style is an explanation of how exactly we receive, store, and use information. A straightforward, but useful, model for personal style was manufactured by Alexander Gregorc. His model uses two perceptual qualities, Abstract and Concrete, and two organizational methods, Sequential and Random (or nonlinear ). Gregorc couples these to form four possible style categories: concrete/sequential (CS), abstract/sequential (AS), abstract/random (AR), and concrete/random (CR). Although everyone has all qualities, most individuals are predisposed toward 1 or 2 of them. A survey unearthed that about 51% of the population prefers CS, 28% AR, 13 % CR, and 8% prefer AS. These refer to a person's dominant style. It is important to consider that everyone has some of every style and there's no "best style ".Still, investigating personal styles could be fun and enlightening.

What's Your Style? A person's dominate style could be linked to preferred occupations, satisfying hobbies, and even things they may find difficult. A simple, 15-question test can determine approximately a person's style. It requires about 10 minutes and is as of this link if you should be interested. (1) The learningweb site even offers more detailed descriptions of each style. Take note that these are extremely approximate categories that will change with time and that they could be situational. A person may prefer one style at the job and another for leisure, like a surgeon who is CS at the job may much prefer AR type activities for hobbies.

Learning Styles: Although a person's style changes with maturation, it is useful to consider that the student features a preferred learning style. Students with a CS style often prefer programmed instruction, workbooks, lab manuals, field trips, and applications while students having an AS style often prefer lectures, books, syllabi, and guided individual study. Students with a CR learning style prefer independent study, games, simulations, and problem solving, and students having an AR style usually prefer television, movies, assignments with reflection time, and group discussions. There were some efforts made to fit teaching styles to student's learning styles but it is impractical except in the biggest of schools. Teachers are encouraged to keep yourself informed of the various learning styles and to use a variety of methods directed to each style. There's much more to understand about personal learning styles and an excellent reference for that's thelearningweb.net.

Political Styles: Perhaps political discourse might be improved by way of a understanding of preferred styles. Probably the most polarizing divide in politics lately have been between Conservatives and Liberals. A 2009 Gallup Poll survey discovered that 40% of Americans describe their political views as conservative, 35% as moderate, and 21% as liberal. That's nearly just like the breakdown in the personal styles categories, however the similarity is interesting. From considering personal styles, we all know that CS and AR dominant people perceive and organize information differently, much as Conservatives and Liberals do. Rather than there being a big Liberal/Conservative divide, perhaps issues could be described as a personal style difference. Then, as opposed to calling each other elitists and ignoramuses, we will just say "That is obviously an abstract/random way of the problem." or "My, aren't we being concrete/sequential today?"